Home Page
 
Activated Carbon
 
Filter System Testing Services
 
Testing Instruments
 
Nuclear Power Plant Services
 
Training
 
Laboratory Testing Services
 
DOE & Defense Facility Services
 
Solvent Vapor Recovery Systems
 
Company Profile & Experience
 
Site Map
 
Employment
NUCON NUCON International, Inc.
7000 Huntley Road   Columbus, OH  43229-1035 U.S.A.
Telephone: 614-846-5710  Fax: 614-431-0858 E-mail sales@nucon-int.com




 

OIL VAPOR REMOVAL FROM COMPRESSED GAS

 

General Considerations

Many gas compressors in use today employ direct lubrication where the oil is admitted to the compressor and thence to the compressed gas. However, in may instances, the presence of this oil is detrimental to subsequent operations and the oil must be removed.

The oil is present in two states. Some of it appears as a fine mist or as small droplets. Oil in this form can best be removed by mechanical means. Any number of types of filters are employed from cotton to specially shaped porous ceramic or sintered metal filters. These filters, however, are unable to remove the oil in the vapor state, and this is where activated carbon can be used to an advantage.

There is very little data concerning the most important aspects of this application. It is very difficult to measure how much oil is in the compressed gas. Most oil removal measurements are based upon the amount a filter picks up in an extended test. Data obtained by this method indicate oil concentrations from 5 to 20 vppm. A more accurate figure may be obtained if the amount of oil added to the compressor is known. A conservative estimate for design purposes is 15 ppm by weight. This is on the order of 1.3 lbs. of oil per million ft.; of gas at STP.

The amount of oil removed by the mechanical filter must be known to size the carbon section. In tests conducted by the Mellon Institute, the ratio of mechanical to adsorptive removal ranged from 260:1 for a highly effective ceramic filter to 1.3:1 for a cotton pad.

The capacity of activated carbon for oil vapor adsorption would ordinarily be very high. However, the concentration of oil in most cases is extremely low especially if an efficient mechanical filter is used upstream of the carbon bed, resulting in a low concentration of the oil entering the carbon bed. Tests have shown that a capacity of approximately 3% by wt. is obtained in an extended test with values ranging from 2% at the outlet end of a deep bed to about 25% at the inlet end where oil leakage into the carbon bed from the mechanical filler (cotton pad) was experienced.

The difficulty in detecting oil in the compressed gas before a filtering operation indicates a magnification of the problem in measuring the effluent oil concentration from a carbon bed. The only method of determining the efficiency of the filter is by careful observation of the behavior of the cleaned gas in subsequent operations. Detailed calculation and common sense sometimes indicate that a filter just cannot be doing an efficient job and yet the small amount of oil that is removed seems to make the difference between acceptable and non-acceptable gas.

Commercially Available Adsorbers

There are any number of commercially available filters employing activated carbon designed mainly for CO2 and compressed air. They typically employ three filters in series, the second one containing activated carbon. The oil adsorbers are also used in soft drink bottling plants to purify CO2. The recommended NUCON grade is NUSORB GC60-3.

Design Considerations

The same design considerations generally apply to the removal of oil from compressed gas as in any other adsorption system although there will be some slight differences.

  1. Concentration of oil in compressed gas:
    Assume 1.3 lbs. per million ft.3 at STP unless there is other data.

  2. Percentage of oil removed by the mechanical filter:
    Assume 60% unless data indicates more.

  3. Adsorptive capacity of carbon for oil vapor:

Assume 3 wt.% capacity at temperatures below 100EF and down to .5 wt.% at temperature as high as 300EF.

Cycle Time:

Most units are designed to operated for more than 6 months. If the quantity of carbon involved is small, it is discarded. If it is large, it can be returned to facilities licensed for reactivation, which will cost approximately $.75/lb. If conditions are such that the carbon capacity is quite low, regeneration in place can be considered. Either steam or hot gas can be used. Temperatures should approach 600EF for complete removal. Care must be taken not to admit gasses containing oxygen to the bed at these high temperatures, i.e. the carbon is to be cooled before returning to air service.

Dimensions of the carbon bed:

Capacity considerations generally fix the volume of the carbon bed. Maximum flow rates are pressures dependent. If these rates are approached, the bed depth should not be less than 4 ft. Eighteen inches should be the minimum depth for any flow rate. Allowable pressure drop will sometimes determine the length of the bed and, therefore, the diameter. In some cases, vessels are already available which also may fix the carbon volume used.

Grades to recommend:

If the velocity is high but the pressure drop is not important, NUSORB G60 6x12 is recommended. When pressure drop is a problem, use NUSORB GC60-3.

Sample Calculation:

Problem: A small compressor is used to supply air for a pneumatic control system. During operation, it supplies 40 CFM at 50 psig and 70EF. It operates approximately 20% of the time. Design a filter to remove oil from the air with a life of 6 months.
Solution:

Total oil content of air in 6 months operation =

40 CFM x 64.7
14.7
x .2 x 60 x 24 x 180 = 9.13 x 106 ft.3

Assume oil content - 1.3 lbs./ million ft.3

Total oil quantity in 6 months = 1.3 x 9.13 = 11.9 lbs.

Assume mechanical filter removes 60 wt.% of the oil.
Amount of oil to be adsorbed by activated carbon = 4.76 lb.

Assume capacity of 2 lb. oil/100 lb. carbon,

carbon needed = 238 lb.


Pressure drop not important recommend G-60-6x12, bulk density - 30 lb./ft.3. Therefore, 7.9 ft.3 of carbon is needed.

Suppose 18" dia. pipe is available. Cross section area is 1.77 ft.2

7.9 ft.3
1.77 ft.2
= 4.5 ft. deep carbon bed

 

Checking superficial velocity: 40 CFM
1.77 ft.2
= 22.5 fpm - OK
which is acceptable for the design.

Pressure drop:

P
DL
= K1 u V + K2 V2 p
P = pressure drop (inch H2O)
D = carbon bulk density = 30 lb/ft3
u = air viscosity = .018 cp for air at these conditions
p = density = .242 lb/ft3
V =

velocity
100

=

22.5 fpm
100

= .225
L = carbon bed depth = 4.5 ft.
K1 = 15.8 for G60-6x12
K2 = 4.12 for G60-6x12
P  = (30) (4.5) [15.8 (.018) (.225) + 4.12 (.242) (.225)2]
    = 135 (.064 + .050)
    = 15.4" H2O pressure drop, which is negligible.

Particle Size K1 K2

4 mm dia. 3.33 1.33
3 mm dia. 7.05 2.12
6/12 mesh 15.8 4.12

Bulletin 11B15-5/92



Additional information about activated carbon can be found on our activated carbon home page.


[Home Page], [Activated Carbon], [Filter System Testing Services], [Testing Instruments] [Nuclear Power Plant Services], [Laboratory Testing Services], [DOE & Defense Facility services], [Solvent Vapor Recovery Systems], [Company Profile & Experience], [Site Map], [Employment]

NUCON International Inc. All Rights Reserved